
Theoretical and conceptual frameworks are essential for guiding research, providing the lens through which we see our knowledge creation. In research related to the internationalisation of higher education and international students, theoretical and conceptual frameworks support with positioning research away from deficit narratives.
This resource is a bank of potential theoretical and conceptual frameworks or models that researchers might consider, along with suggested readings to get you started with learning about them and seeing them in research practice. This list is purposefully simplified for beginners and we use the term ‘theoretical framework’ in its broadest sense possible. We recommend that scholars do much more discipline-specific reading before embedding any concepts into their research designs. We also highlight there are disciplinary and epistemological variations in how words like ‘theory’, ‘concept’, or ‘model’ are used for research, which readers should be mindful of.
Please contact us if you have suggestions for new frameworks to add or a paper you would like included as an example.
Theories about ‘experiences’
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological systems theory | The multiple environmental and social systems that impact on an individuals’ experiences | Original: Bronfenbrenner (1979) Further conceptualisation in higher education: Jones (2017) Example in practice: Elliot et al. (2016) |
| Multidimensional transition theory | The multi-layered academic, social, and emotional transitions that individuals encounter when moving from one space to another | Introduction: Jindal-Snape & Ingram (2013) Example in practice: Jindal-Snape & Rienties (2016) |
| Academic resilience theory | Students’ capacity to adapt and develop under uncertainty or adversity | One approach: Holdsworth et al. (2017) Example in practice: Singh (2021) |
| Rhizomatic transitions | Construction of students’ transitions experiences away from linear pathways towards more fluid, ongoing experiences | Original: Deleuze & Guatarri (1987) Further conceptualisation in higher education: Gravett (2019) Example in practice: Balloo et al. (2021) |
| Student engagement model | Model of factors that impact students’ university retention and success | Original: Tinto (1975) Example in practice: Rienties et al. (2012) |
| Liminality | Transitional space that may lead to disorientation or ambiguity | Original: Turner (1969) Example in practice: Parker et al. (2010) |
Theories about identities and ‘the self’
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Student agency theory | Students’ capacity to make choices within the constraints of their lived realities | One approach: Biesta & Tedder (2007) Example in practice: Tran & Vu (2016) |
| Identity theory | The construction of the self through interactions with experiences and culture | One approach: Hall (1996) Example in practice: Pham & Saltmarsh (2013) |
| Self-formation | The enactment of agency and development of identity through higher education study | Starting point: Marginson (2013) |
| Capability approach | Theory that people achieve well-being through their capabilities to be and do what they value | One approach: Nussbaum (2011) Another approach: Sen (1973); Sen (1995) Example in practice: Fakunle (2020) |
| Possible selves | Approach to understanding individuals’ imagined “like-to-be” and “like-to-avoid” futures | Original: Markus & Nurius (1986) Application to higher education: Harrison (2018); Henderson et al. (2019) Example in practice: Yang & Noels (2013) |
| Intersectional theory | Framework for understanding how a person’s multiple identities lead to different forms of oppression and discrimination | Original: Crenshaw (1989) Example in practice: Glass et al. (2022) |
| Critical race theory | Recognition of race as a social construct and how social structures are inherently racist | Starting point: McCoy (2015) Reflection in education: DeCuir & Dixson (2004) Example in practice: Yao et al. (2018) |
| Critical race feminism | A branch of critical race theory which looks at the intersectional oppressions experienced by women of color | Original: Wing (1997) Example in practice: Jones (2023) |
| Asian critical race theory (AsianCrit) | A branch of critical race theory focusing specifically on the racialized experiences of Asians | Starting point: Iftikar & Museus (2018) Example in practice: Yao & Mwangi (2022) |
| Gendered racialisation | The intersecting identities of gender and race | Original: Selod (2018) Example in practice: Karaman & Christian (2020) |
| Raciolinguistics | The ways that language shapes our thinking about race or racialised practices | Starting point: Alim et al. (2016) Example in practice: Dovchin (2019) |
Theories about pedagogies
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Critical pedagogies | Application of critical theory to education; philosophy of education that focuses on issues of social justice, power imbalances, and domination | Originals: Freire (1970); Giroux (2011) Linked to international students: Khalideen (2015) |
| hooks’ Engaged pedagogy | Critical pedagogy approach that values relationships between student / teacher, teacher self-actualisation, humanistic approaches to education | Original: hooks (1994) Linked to international students: Madge et al. (2009) |
| Academic hospitality | Reflection on academic staff as ‘hosts’ to reciprocally support students as ‘guests’ | Original: Bennett (2000) Further conceptualisation: Ploner (2018) |
| Bernstein’s pedagogic devices | Theory focusing on the ways pedagogies represent symbolic control over knowledge | Original: Bernstein (2000) Example in practice: Zeegers & Barron (2008) |
| Transformative learning | Evaluation of past experience through the acquisition of new knowledge | Original: Mezirow (1991) Example in practice: Nada et al. (2018); Nada & Legutko (2022); López Murillo (2021) |
| Pedagogy of possibility | Reflections on the ways that pedagogy has the potential to contribute to the ‘service of human freedom’ | Original: Simon (1987) Example in practice: Cassily & Clarke-Vivier (2016) |
Theories about the curriculum
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Hidden curriculum | The unwritten lessons learned about normative values, beliefs, ethics, etc. as a result of educational provisions and settings | Starting point: Apple (1989) Example in practice: Kidman et al. (2017) |
| Internationalisation of the curriculum | Inclusion of international or intercultural elements into the content and delivery of education | Starting point: Leask (2015) Further theorisation: Clifford & Montgomery (2017) Example in practice: Vishwanath & Mummery (2018) |
| Glocalisation | The blending of global and local elements in the curriculum | Starting point: Robertson (1994) Further theorisation in higher education: Patel & Lynch (2013) |
| Tourist gaze | Approach to learning about other cultures as a ‘guest’ or ‘tourist’ | Starting point: Urry & Larsen (2011) Example in practice: Vinall & Shin (2019) |
Theories about society and social interactions
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Bourdieusian theory | Set of thinking tools for investigating power and the way it impacts individuals and societies through structural constraints | Original: Bourdieu (1979) Helpful guide: Grenfell (2013) Situated in higher education: Heffernan (2022) Example in practice: Xu (2017) |
| Foucauldian theory | Set of thinking tools for investigating power relationships in society, including how they influence language or practice | Original: Foucault (1977); Foucault (1972) Helpful guide: Ball (2013) Example in practice: Koehne (2006) |
| Goffman’s ‘performative self’ and ‘stigmatised self’ | Set of thinking tools for investigating the ways that people present and manage their identities in social spaces | Original: Goffman (1959) Example in practice: Li (2015) |
| Gramscian theory | Theory of cultural hegemony – how the state and high economic class use institutions to maintain power | Original: Gramsci (1971) Helpful guide: Mayo (2015) Example in practice: Kim (2011) |
| Marx’s conflict theory | Theory that conflict exists in society where people compete for finite resources | Original: Rowcroft (2021) Example in practice: Jiang (2011) |
| Durkheim’s solidarity (and the following structural functionalism) | Society is a sum of its interlinking parts and institutions can be studied to understand their role in maintaining social cohesion | Original: Durkheim (1895) Example in higher education: Bodin & Orange (2018) |
| Systems theory | Society exists as a set of social systems and subsystems | Original: Luhmann (2012) Example in higher education: Kleimann (2019) |
| Wenger’s communities of practice | A set of people who share a common interest or practice | Original: Wenger (1998) Example in practice: Montgomery & McDowell (2008) |
| Holland’s figured worlds | Development of the self in relation to the social types in their surrounding world | Original: Holland et al (2001) Example in practice: Chang et al., (2017) |
| Engestrom’s cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) | Relationship between the mind and action within an individual’s situated social world | Original: Engestrom (2001) Example in practice: Straker (2016) |
| Weber’s Social action theory | The way behaviours are shaped and understood through social reactions of others | Original: Weber (1978) Example in practice: Cantwell et al. (2009) |
| Fraser’s social justice theory | A framework for understanding the causes and mechanisms of justice and injustice | Starting point: Vincent (2019) Example in practice: Briffett Aktaş (2021) |
| Hall’s Reception theory | Theory about the audience reception and interpretation of communication within their sociocultural contexts | Starting point: Hall (1973) Example in practice: Smyth (2009) |
| Archer’s morphogenesis | Society has no ‘pre-set’ form, but is constantly developing and changing through activity and individual agency | Original: Archer (1995) Example in higher education: Case (2015) |
Decolonial / postcolonial theories
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Decoloniality | Resistance to the ‘colonial matrix of power’ that affects what we value, our laws, economics, knowledge systems and curriculum | Key author*: Mignolo (2000), (2018) Helpful guide: Maldonaldo-Torres (2011) Reflection in international higher education: Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2021) Example in practice with international students: Bardhan and Zhang (2017) |
| Quijano’s coloniality of power | How social power relations continue to be dominated by Eurocentric colonialism | Original: Quijano (2000) Example in practice: Udah (2021) |
| Said’s Orientalism | Negative portrayals and ‘othering’ of ‘the East’ by ‘the West’ which serve to maintain colonial power and assumed superiority | Originals: Said (1978), Tibawi (1965), Djait (1977) Helpful guide: Leonardo (2020) Example in practice: Yao (2018) |
| Fanon’s Subjugation | Forced dominance of one group over another through (neo-)colonialism and violence | Original: Fanon, (1952) Helpful guide in education: Leonardo & Singh (2017) |
| Du Bois’ double consciousness | The experience of dual identities in conflict within an oppressive society | Original: Du Bois (1903) Example in practice: Valdez (2015) |
| Spivak’s epistemic violence | Damage imposed on the knowledge systems of marginalised groups | Original: Spivak (1988) Reflection in international higher education: Stein (2017) |
| Memmi’s colonial identity | Complex experiences of both being colonised and feeling a sense of identity with the coloniser | Original: Memmi (1957) |
| Whiteness as futurity | The ways that whiteness and supremacy of Western higher education perpetuates future neo-colonialism | Starting point: Shahjahan & Edwards (2022) Example in practice: Xu (2022) |
Theories about culture and multiculturalism
| Halliday’s ‘small culture’ theory | The avoidance of a national essentialism of culture through understanding cultural similarities of small social groupings | Original: Halliday (1999) Example in practice: Johansen & Tkachenko (2019) |
| Bhabha’s third space / hybridity | The sense of ‘limbo’ or ‘in between-ness’ of individuals’ cultural identities | Original: Bhabha (1994) Example in practice: Pitts & Brooks (2017) |
| Everyday multiculturalism | Reflections on how multiculturalism is experienced in everyday interactions | Original: Wise & Velayutham (2009) Example in practice: Oke et al. (2015) |
| Flexible citizenship | Theory about the ways globalization have created a “transnational” public | Original: Ong (1999) Example in practice: Fong (2011) |
| Cosmopolitan agency | The ways an individual may actively seek interactions that render openness, respect, reflexivity in the face of cultural difference | Original: Kudo (2022) |
Theories about intercultural friendships or relationships
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Intercultural friendship framework | Framework for understanding how intercultural friendships develop on higher education campuses | Kudo et al. (2019) |
| Intergroup contact theory | Theory that biases and prejudices can be minimized through positive contact with people from different outgroups | Original: Allport (1954) More modern introduction: Dovidio et al. (2005) Meta-analysis: Pettigrew & Tropp (2006) |
| Intergroup threat theory | Theory that encounters between individuals from different backgrounds can lead to discomforts or threatening feelings | Original: Stephen & Stephen (2000) Example in practice: Harrison & Peacock (2009) |
| Blumer’s symbolic interactionism | Symbolic meaning developed through social interactions and relationships | Original: Blumer (1969) Example in practice: Tran & Pham (2016) |
| Homans’ social exchange theory | Understanding the motivations and expectations of individuals in social interactions | Original: Homans (1958) Example in practice: Fan et al. (2018) |
Theories about mobilities and space
| Theory | Purposefully over-simplified description | Suggested reading(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial theories | Relations between socially-constructed spaces and times | Original: Lefebvre & Nicholson-Smith (1991) Further theorisation in higher education: Larsen & Beech (2014) Example in practice: Waters & Leung (2012) |
| Migration infrastructures | Interlinking structures that enable or constrain mobilities | Starting point: Xiang & Lindquist (2018) Example in practice: Hu et al. (2020) |
| Anzaldúa’s borderlands | Analysis of complex cultural hybridities in border spaces | Original: Anzaldúa (1987) |
| Ahmed’s ‘encounters’ | The meeting points of ‘familiar’ and ‘unfamiliar’ bodies | Original: Ahmed (2000) Further reading: Ombagi (2016) |

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


